Tech | Visa | Scholarship/School | Info Place

Which tool should you choose?

Asana and Jira are two popular project management tools that support agile management.

While both tools are fairly comprehensive, Asana is a flexible and user-friendly tool that will appeal to a variety of teams, from marketing to sales, design, and more. It offers an easy, intuitive way to organize work, with features like task lists, boards, calendars, and more.

On the other hand, Jira, developed by Atlassian, is a project management tool designed for software development teams. It offers a powerful set of features to support agile methodologies, including scrum and kanban boards, backlogs, sprint planning tools, and more.

Asana vs. Jira: Comparison Chart

feature
Asanas
Gila
Our Rating
4.6 out of 5
3.9 out of 5
Starting price (monthly billing)
$13.49 per user per month
$8.15 per user per month
Ease of use
simple
More complex
Agile support
Yes
Yes (more powerful)
Native time tracking
Yes
Yes
Gantt chart
Yes
Yes

Asana vs. Jira: Pricing

Asana’s pricing structure is simple, offering three tiers for individuals and businesses, including a free tier that provides basic functionality and supports up to 10 users. But you have to pay for features like Gantt charts and timeline views. The remaining two tiers are reserved for businesses, and you’ll get pricing based on your requirements.

As for Jira, we have four tiers, with the free tier accommodating up to 10 users. The two premium tiers after the free tier are much cheaper than similar tiers in Asana. However, when Jira is billed annually, it removes the per-user fee, and these tiers accommodate more than 200 users. This gives the impression that while Jira is suitable for smaller teams, its pricing is more suitable for larger and expanding teams.

Asana Pricing

  • personal: Always free.
  • starter: $10.99 per user per month, billed annually, or $13.49 per user per month, billed monthly.
  • advanced: $24.99 per user per month, billed annually, or $30.49 per user per month, billed monthly.
  • enterprise: Custom pricing.
  • Enterprise+: Custom pricing.

For more information on Asana, read our full Asana review or check out our Asana alternatives.

Jira pricing

  • Free: Can be used by up to 10 users.
  • standard: $8.15 per user per month.
  • High quality: $16 per user per month.
  • enterprise: Custom pricing, annual billing only.

For more details, check out our full Jira Software review, or for other ideas, check out our Jira alternatives.

Asana vs. Jira: Feature Comparison

Agile support

Winner: Jira

Asana supports agile project management with its Kanban-style boards. They are a visual way to manage workflows, allowing teams to easily track progress and prioritize tasks effectively. While Asana’s boards are easy to use and flexible (plus features like custom fields and task dependencies for creating Scrum-like workflows), it lacks some of the advanced features found in tools designed specifically for agile development, like Jira. Jira is better suited for teams using a more flexible or hybrid agile approach.

Teams using Scrum or Kanban methodologies will feel right at home with Jira’s Agile Board. The board is highly customizable and integrates with other Jira features, such as backlog and sprint planning tools. Jira’s Agile capabilities are more advanced than Asana, offering comprehensive features to manage complex projects and accurately track progress.

Set up a Kanban board for your software project in Jira.
Setting up a Kanban board for a software project in Jira. Image: Collins Ayuya/Jira

Native time tracking

Winner: Tie

Asana offers native time tracking capabilities to Premium, Enterprise, and Enterprise+ customers, allowing users to track time spent on tasks directly within the platform. Additionally, you can integrate it with a variety of time tracking tools like Harvest, Everhour, and Toggl to track time spent on various tasks directly within Asana. These integrations are useful for teams that need time tracking but don’t subscribe to Asana’s premium pricing tiers. They’re also useful for users who may find the integrations to be more useful than the native time tracking capabilities.

Jira also has built-in time tracking capabilities. Users can record work on issues and track time spent, time remaining, and original estimates. The platform offers many configuration options for time tracking and reporting, giving you a sense of greater flexibility and oversight over your tracking activities. Teams using Scrum or Kanban methodologies will value this, as tracking time spent on tasks can help with sprint planning and managing ongoing work.

Set up time tracking in Jira.
Setting up time tracking in Jira. Image: Collins Ayuya/Jira

Gantt chart

Winner: Asana

It can be said that Asana’s timeline view can provide Gantt chart functionality to a certain extent. However, Asana does have a Gantt chart feature independent of the timeline view. I found it very simple to visually plan project schedules in Asana and display task dependencies and timelines. These charts are easy to use and integrate seamlessly with other project views, which makes it simple to switch between different perspectives of the project. However, Asana’s Gantt chart feature is not available for personal plans, but the timeline view is available.

Create custom Gantt charts in Asana.
Create a custom Gantt chart in Asana. Image credit: Collins Ayuya/Asana

Speaking of timeline view, Jira’s timeline view is one of its two native Gantt chart products. With it, you get the tools and controls to track complex projects with multiple tasks and large teams. However, it’s best suited for team-level management. The second product is Schedule, an advanced planning feature that can visualize the work of multiple teams, projects, or even projects across an entire organization. It’s available in Jira Premium.

A preview of the timeline view in Jira.
A preview of the timeline view in Jira. Image credit: Collins Ayuya/Jira

Ease of use

Winner: Asana

Asana is known for its intuitive, user-friendly interface. It’s designed with a focus on simplicity, allowing new users to get started quickly. Compared to Jira, I found it easier to pick up and use. The visual layout combined with the drag-and-drop functionality makes managing tasks and projects more intuitive. For teams looking for a low learning curve, Asana might be a good choice. However, it’s worth noting that it has some advanced features that might take some time to master.

Asana's interface with projects set up in list view.
Asana’s interface with projects set up in list view. Image credit: Collins Ayuya/Asana

Jira’s interface is more complex due to its extensive feature set and customization options.

While Jira does a good job of onboarding new users and making the platform feel as simple and easy to use as possible, Jira’s robust feature set and highly technical nature work against it as it still feels complex, especially to non-technical users. Even so, while this complexity can be a challenge for new users, Jira offers comprehensive tutorials and documentation to help users navigate its features, but it generally takes more time to master than Asana.

Customer Support

Winner: Jira

Asana offers a variety of support options, depending on the pricing plan. The free plan includes access to community support and basic Asana support. Paid plans offer more extensive support, with 24/7 support available only to enterprise users. Asana also offers a range of resources, such as tutorials, webinars, and a detailed knowledge base, which are available in most of its pricing tiers.

As for Jira, we look forward to providing stronger customer support across its pricing tiers. The free plan includes access to the Atlassian Community. The Standard plan provides local business hours support, while the Premium plan provides 24/7 support for critical issues. Enterprise users can enjoy 24/7 support for all issues and a higher uptime SLA.

Safety

Winner: Tie

Asana prioritizes security, offering features like encryption of data at rest and in transit, as well as SAML, SIEM integration, DLP, and advanced administrative controls in its Enterprise plan. The platform complies with major industry standards like SOC 2 Type II, which means strong data protection measures are always in place.

Some of the security options available in Asana.
Some of the security options available in Asana. Image: Collins Ayuya/Asana

Jira also has comprehensive security features, especially in its Premium and Enterprise plans. These include advanced administrative controls, SAML SSO, SCIM for user provisioning, and encryption. Jira’s Enterprise plan also offers additional security measures such as audit logs, BYOK encryption, and compliance with various industry standards, making it suitable for organizations with strict security requirements.

Asana Pros and Cons

Advantages of Asana

  • Has a user-friendly interface and is highly flexible.
  • A visual approach to project management makes it easier for teams to manage their work.
  • Its versatility means it is suitable for a wide range of industries and teams.
  • Asana has a wide range of integration capabilities.

Cons of Asana

  • Asana lacks some of the more advanced features found in tools like Jira.
  • Its reporting capabilities are limited compared to Jira.
  • There is no native time tracking in the lower plans.
  • There may be too many features for a small team to fully utilize

Pros and Cons of Jira

Advantages of Jira

  • The focus on agile methodologies makes it a powerful tool for software development teams.
  • With advanced reporting and analysis capabilities.
  • Pricing scales based on the number of users, making it perfect for scaling your team.
  • Has extensive Gantt chart capabilities.

Disadvantages of Jira

  • The high degree of technicality is a barrier to entry for non-technical users.
  • It can be overwhelming for first-time users.
  • The selection of project views is limited.
  • COLLABORATION TOOLS LIMITED.

Should your organization use Asana or Jira?

It depends on your needs and workflow. If your team values ​​a user-friendly interface with flexible task management, then Asana is the better choice. On the other hand, if your team is heavily invested in agile methodologies, especially in a software development environment, then Jira can offer significant advantages.

However, nothing beats hands-on experience, and since Asana and Jira offer free plans, we encourage you to try each tool to see which works best for your team.

Choose Asana if…

  • You need a user-friendly solution with simple and flexible functionality.
  • You need basic to intermediate project management capabilities.
  • You need a solution that can adapt to a variety of teams and industries.
  • You value collaboration and communication tools.
  • You don’t want a project management tool with a learning curve that’s too steep.

Choose Jira if…

  • You need advanced project tracking as well as advanced agile capabilities.
  • You need extensive customization and integration capabilities.
  • You are in an extremely technical field, especially software development.
  • You already use other Atlassian tools.
  • You must have advanced reporting and analytics capabilities.

Review Methodology

For this head-to-head comparison, the key criteria for comparison was how Asana and Jira approach agile project management. We signed up for the free trials offered by both tools to get hands-on experience with each tool to determine their ease of use, strengths, and weaknesses. We then compared our findings with the features and capabilities listed on the platforms’ web pages.

Finally, we compared our findings with feedback from real users to see if we had similar experiences. Below is a summary of their comparison in terms of criteria other than Agile Management.

standard
Asanas
Gila
feature
4.9/5
5/5
Price
2/5
4.4/5
Ease of use
5/5
4/5
Service and Support
2.9/5
4.3/5

#tool #choose

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Index